| Greetings and welcome to The Football Net. We love talking balls, do you? You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. Therefore you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, take part in the banter, vote in polls and enjoy fun competitions such as fantasy football and the betting exchange. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join us today on our football forums to talk balls with us! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| City To Buy Aguero | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Sep 25 2008, 10:54 AM (341 Views) | |
| flak | Sep 25 2008, 03:42 PM Post #31 |
|
It's nearly Christmas
|
Yes who'd have thought it could get worse than Abramovich?
|
| |
|
|
| RetardedDwarf | Sep 25 2008, 03:49 PM Post #32 |
![]()
Hamster Molester
|
Wouldnt say its worse lol, its only a repeat of the 1st season RA took over. We were linked with just about every big name player in the world. If even a 3rd of paper talk had been true we would have had a squad of 60..........including the likes of Henry, Ronaldo (old one), Santa Claus, Ronaldino, Pele, old mother hubbard and lassie. |
| |
|
|
| maineroadman | Sep 25 2008, 03:51 PM Post #33 |
|
forever a blue
|
i take your point, but how many clubs can afford that kind of CRAZY money, city, chelsea , cant see anyone else havin that kind of cash |
|
city, city , the greatist in the land and all the world, well stockport anyway | |
|
|
| thefieldsofanfieldroad | Sep 25 2008, 03:55 PM Post #34 |
|
“The trouble with referees is that they know the rules, but they do not know the game.”
|
its only going to be crazy money because city were mentioned. if it would of been arsenal, liverpool or even utd £43m would not of been the figure thrown around imo |
|
|
| maineroadman | Sep 25 2008, 03:56 PM Post #35 |
|
forever a blue
|
couldnt agree more
|
|
city, city , the greatist in the land and all the world, well stockport anyway | |
|
|
| flak | Sep 25 2008, 04:02 PM Post #36 |
|
It's nearly Christmas
|
Think that would be a pretty decent forward line actually.Yeah the only way City are going to get these players is if they chuck silly money around. Saying that I think the Robinho fee was probably the right one for him. |
| |
|
|
| The welsh wizard | Sep 25 2008, 04:43 PM Post #37 |
|
Grade A Leprechaun
|
who knows... inter,juve and milan are a clubs with rich owners that can afford to pay crazy money. people assume otherwise becuse they dont do it often |
|
|
| kebabeater | Sep 26 2008, 08:50 PM Post #38 |
|
Tadpole's Excrement
|
like fergie said, city can afford the player, but does the player want to go to city? probably not
|
| Manchester = 50% United, 31% City, 19% the rest. Manchester is RED. Always has been. | |
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Barclays Premier League · Next Topic » |







Think that would be a pretty decent forward line actually.

9:53 AM Jul 11