-
Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Greetings and welcome to The Football Net. We love talking balls, do you?


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. Therefore you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, take part in the banter, vote in polls and enjoy fun competitions such as fantasy football and the betting exchange. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join us today on our football forums to talk balls with us!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
F1 Working On Passing Concerns
Topic Started: Sep 30 2008, 01:40 PM (405 Views)
Deleted User
Deleted User

Big three teams co-operate on car design changes to raise chances of overtaking

A strong case can be made that circuit design militates against passing moves, but for 2009 the design of Formula One cars themselves will change yet again. Backed by the sport's ruling body, the FIA, and in an extraordinary and hitherto unknown spirit of mutual collaboration, design engineers from the three leading teams of 2006 – Ferrari, Renault and McLaren – pooled their knowledge, resources and experience to frame crucial new aerodynamic regulations aimed specifically at creating better overtaking opportunities. The plan was not to make passing so easy that it happens like points in basketball, however.

"Great overtaking," suggests McLaren's Paddy Lowe, who together with Renault's Pat Symonds and Ferrari's Rory Byrne formed the Overtaking Working Group, "is appreciated most where the guy has really worked for it. My personal favourite was when Mika Hakkinen passed Michael Schumacher at Spa in 2000 as both of them overtook on either side of Ricardo Zonta going up the hill to Les Combes."

Basing their investigation on empirically sourced information from McLaren's highly advanced simulator, the working group figured that at the old Barcelona circuit, with a fast corner leading on to the main straight, the driver in a following car needed an advantage of two seconds a lap in order to have a chance of overtaking into the ensuing first corner. The aim was to reduce that to a second, and the McLaren test driver Pedro de la Rosa tried a wide variety of aero configurations in the simulator until a suitable combination was achieved.

During the research it emerged that the wind tunnel is still the most suitable investigative tool, rather than computational fluid dynamics, with which former design Nick Wirth had carried out previous studies which led to the two-part CDG rear wing. The FIA planned to make that mandatory next year before the group's work exposed flaws in its conception.

"Almost all of the attempts to reduce downforce in the recent past have been retrograde in terms of overtaking possibilities and wake behaviour," one working group representative observed. "If we had wanted to make overtaking chances worse, that's what we would have come up with..."

The 2009 cars will have fewer ugly appendages, such as barge boards and air extractor chimneys – partly to reduce drag and partly because team principals want better advertising space – but the real key is management of the turbulent wake that each car generates. The rear wings will be smaller and mounted higher, while the front wings will be wider and mounted lower.

Crucially, drivers will also be allowed to adjust their front wings while in motion, through three degrees, twice per lap – the first time that movable aerodynamics have been legal in Formula One since wings first appeared 40 years ago. Thus drivers will have a much better chance of maintaining their car's balance while chasing another, and that should reduce the understeer that currently militates against overtaking attempts.

"There won't be any overtaking here," Lewis Hamilton said prior to Sunday's Singapore Grand Prix, "but I hope things will be very different with next year's cars."
Quote Post Goto Top
 
talkingsense®
Member Avatar
football fundamentalist
The sport needs overtaking to keep fans interested.

Watching MotoGP races is more exciting for this very reason.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jimmymac™
Member Avatar
Inspirational
Its this "turbulent wake" that needs looking at the most, go back a fair few years and if you were tucked up behind someone the slipstream was so much better that you got a great advantage allowing a driver to try overtaking.

With the inception of all of these mad designs onto the body the air behind the cars has become more and more problematic and the advantage practically nullified. End of the day, why would a designer be bothered about what the air did once it had fully past the car, thats not his problem. Coming to an agreement like this to try and calm that air could provide enough to make things more interesting.

I certainly hope that this comes to fruition
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
talkingsense®
Member Avatar
football fundamentalist
Jimmymac
Sep 30 2008, 05:20 PM
Its this "turbulent wake" that needs looking at the most, go back a fair few years and if you were tucked up behind someone the slipstream was so much better that you got a great advantage allowing a driver to try overtaking.

With the inception of all of these mad designs onto the body the air behind the cars has become more and more problematic and the advantage practically nullified. End of the day, why would a designer be bothered about what the air did once it had fully past the car, thats not his problem. Coming to an agreement like this to try and calm that air could provide enough to make things more interesting.

I certainly hope that this comes to fruition

Wouldn't it be better if it came to all the world's F1 race track?

Where is fruition by the way?
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Formula 1 · Next Topic »
Add Reply

-- -