| Greetings and welcome to The Football Net. We love talking balls, do you? You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. Therefore you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, take part in the banter, vote in polls and enjoy fun competitions such as fantasy football and the betting exchange. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join us today on our football forums to talk balls with us! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| 'One-Club Man' Terry Wants Man City Talks; TERRY DEMANDS CITY TALKS | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 12 2009, 09:34 AM (1,121 Views) | |
| akuta | Jul 12 2009, 04:11 PM Post #46 |
|
Sausage Warrior
|
No it doesnt you ninny.... It proves chelsea can and will get the re-financing done if roman were to leave this second but since he is well and truely in love with the club, that aint gonna happen
|
|
|
| Deleted User | Jul 12 2009, 04:19 PM Post #47 |
|
Deleted User
|
it proves that chelsea are valued at £300m euro, owe a debt of approx £500m and would struggle to fund repayments AND fund the club at it current status. |
|
|
| akuta | Jul 12 2009, 04:45 PM Post #48 |
|
Sausage Warrior
|
Bloody hell i would like to know where you got your finance lessons from... Revenue generated does not equal total value.. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Jul 12 2009, 04:50 PM Post #49 |
|
Deleted User
|
are we talking about direct, indirect, fixed, variable, absorbed, unabsorbed, uplifting, apportioning or just plane old cost plans? ![]() I understand what revenue is, but the players and club have operational costs contracted in which means the club will not continue at the same level |
|
|
| akuta | Jul 12 2009, 05:07 PM Post #50 |
|
Sausage Warrior
|
show off.. but the fact is the club is making more money than it is spending each year which makes it a viable business |
|
|
| Deleted User | Jul 12 2009, 05:08 PM Post #51 |
|
Deleted User
|
but it's being kept artificial by the input from Roman. He goes, pop goes Chelsea in the current form |
|
|
| akuta | Jul 12 2009, 05:19 PM Post #52 |
|
Sausage Warrior
|
wrong... he goes, an entire valuation of the club is made and he will make up his mind how much he would be willing to sell the club for or alternatively (which is what will most likely happen) he will act as a financial institution and sell the club minus its debts and have the new owners pay him a fee every month plus interest which will cover the amount owed to him by the club. What you are contemplating would be financially impossible simply because he would require the monies owed to be repayed |
|
|
| Deleted User | Jul 12 2009, 05:26 PM Post #53 |
|
Deleted User
|
if he wants the loans repaid, then the club is sold to make the payments. The club is valued with it's currents assets and its liabilities. The clubs value is lower than the amount owed, so any creditor willing to finance will not pay for something that it can't cover, unless another 'sugar daddy' comes in and pays what is required to clear the loans. |
|
|
| akuta | Jul 12 2009, 05:44 PM Post #54 |
|
Sausage Warrior
|
what you have just pointed out imo shows how difficult it would be for roman to leave the club... He will want his money back, if he cant get it, he will stay with the club.. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Jul 12 2009, 05:49 PM Post #55 |
|
Deleted User
|
lets hope that he doesn't go, because it will be a bad thing for all |
|
|
| flak | Jul 12 2009, 09:31 PM Post #56 |
|
It's nearly Christmas
|
Which will mean him just losing more and more money every year until he does decide to go? |
| |
|
|
| akuta | Jul 13 2009, 09:04 AM Post #57 |
|
Sausage Warrior
|
In my view it just shows that he wants to be there long term... There has to be a viable business model thats my arguement |
|
|
| Robertomancity | Jul 13 2009, 09:11 AM Post #58 |
|
What day is it?
|
Cant believe you all buying into the news of the world hahahah Also russia unearned money I heard you say??? that team your a FAN off is 800m in debt and still getting in debt tryiong to stay where you are. So whos really spending 'unearned money'?? |
|
|
| akuta | Jul 13 2009, 10:51 AM Post #59 |
|
Sausage Warrior
|
Wham Bam thank you ma'm... Hit the nail on the head mate, but the flip side of that is they will always have a structure and finance (which is the conventional way of doing things in finance) whereas your team is doing things in a rather different way which they refuse to accept is both moral and legal at the same time... Its a holier than thou thing Man Utd supporters have..... ignore them when they start rantin |
|
|
| Robertomancity | Jul 13 2009, 10:53 AM Post #60 |
|
What day is it?
|
i know its not right what we're doing but the league table is almost set in stone now every season the only way the top 4 is going to be broken is by doing this. |
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Barclays Premier League · Next Topic » |






8:23 PM Jul 11