| Greetings and welcome to The Football Net. We love talking balls, do you? You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. Therefore you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, take part in the banter, vote in polls and enjoy fun competitions such as fantasy football and the betting exchange. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join us today on our football forums to talk balls with us! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| United ownership thread | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 15 2010, 11:42 PM (1,589 Views) | |
| TheReturnOfTheKing | Nov 16 2010, 03:42 PM Post #16 |
|
Definitely NOT a Terrorist
|
the interest was put on top of the loan for example 200m at 10 percent in 2009 was 220m at 10 percent in 2010 |
| no | |
|
|
| Jeffers | Nov 16 2010, 04:30 PM Post #17 |
|
Ginger Prince
|
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11667_6511299,00.html artical on increasing revenue |
| "I don't play against a particular team. I play against the idea of losing." - Cantona | |
|
|
| EL.I.AM LEGEND | Nov 16 2010, 05:12 PM Post #18 |
|
------------------------
|
If they have sold other assets and put the money in to Utd. Eventually they will want to take it back out. Then back to square one |
| You'll Never Win Anything | |
|
|
| Monty | Nov 16 2010, 05:19 PM Post #19 |
![]()
I'm a naughty boy
|
Erm no, cos they aren't putting any money into Utd by doing this. |
|
|
| stacie | Nov 16 2010, 07:37 PM Post #20 |
|
Dipped in chocolate, bronzed with elegance
|
Yeah but the article says that the Glazers have shouldered the interest payments, too afraid to put them on the club. |
|
flak and gary love stacie and weep sorrowful tears when she's not around | |
|
|
| TheReturnOfTheKing | Nov 16 2010, 07:39 PM Post #21 |
|
Definitely NOT a Terrorist
|
i swear keano told me no interest payments were being paid by anyone on the pkr loans, instead they were put back onto the debt |
| no | |
|
|
| stacie | Nov 16 2010, 07:42 PM Post #22 |
|
Dipped in chocolate, bronzed with elegance
|
just going on what the article's saying, that the glazers are paying the interest and want to pay the whole thing off now before interest payments get bigger and make the loan huge. |
|
flak and gary love stacie and weep sorrowful tears when she's not around | |
|
|
| Monty | Nov 16 2010, 07:49 PM Post #23 |
![]()
I'm a naughty boy
|
The Glazers are liable for the PIKs, not the club. The fear most people had was that they would take out dividends to pay for their debt. They have never done that. |
|
|
| mercedes | Nov 16 2010, 08:51 PM Post #24 |
![]()
Old Hag
|
i dont get any of this and i know 200m is only a dent in our debts but if thats gonna be paid off then its still brilliant news that the owners are willing to pay a quarter of it off when they have been absolute jerks so far. every little helps and all that |
![]() GET YOUR KIT OFF | |
|
|
| treble | Nov 16 2010, 10:49 PM Post #25 |
![]()
The Chosen Juan
|
It's £230m and equates to about a third of the total debt from what has been reported so it's a pretty decent dent. Although there are concerns about the debt and about the Glaziers, they seem to be a lot more financially secure than ppl have given them credit for in recent times. Ppl are talking about where this money is coming from, but even if it is a loan from some unrelated business venture all it shows is that in the middle of a recession and a credit crunch, banks and/or other lenders still consider the Glaziers a sound investment to give £230m to. Considering Gillette and Hicks went everywhere cap in hand and couldn't get a pot to p*** in, this shows the difference with the Glaziers. Ofcourse it may not be a loan at all and that would also show they are a lot more financially secure. This has come out of the blue and can only be considered a good thing for the club. On another note, there are rumours this is being done in order for them to sell the club. |
| |
|
|
| Papa_Lazarou | Nov 17 2010, 12:10 AM Post #26 |
|
Randolph
|
Maybe they are selling it to a consortium lead by Hicks and Gillette
|
![]() Oppa Papa Style | |
|
|
| treble | Nov 17 2010, 12:15 AM Post #27 |
![]()
The Chosen Juan
|
it could be worse, they might be selling it to the green and gold campaign
|
| |
|
|
| Monty | Nov 17 2010, 12:16 AM Post #28 |
![]()
I'm a naughty boy
|
Them winkers will be all over the media spouting their shite if that was the case. |
|
|
| treble | Nov 17 2010, 12:24 AM Post #29 |
![]()
The Chosen Juan
|
I'm sure they'll be on soon enough preparing a phantom bid. |
| |
|
|
| The Derry Pele | Nov 17 2010, 12:10 PM Post #30 |
![]()
Free Suarez
|
They have started renting out grannys to wayne rooney
|
F**k Damien Duff
| |
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Barclays Premier League · Next Topic » |








it could be worse, they might be selling it to the green and gold campaign

8:08 PM Jul 11