| Greetings and welcome to The Football Net. We love talking balls, do you? You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. Therefore you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, take part in the banter, vote in polls and enjoy fun competitions such as fantasy football and the betting exchange. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join us today on our football forums to talk balls with us! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| United ownership thread | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 15 2010, 11:42 PM (1,585 Views) | |
| Jeffers | Jan 7 2011, 12:57 AM Post #76 |
|
Ginger Prince
|
i just crunched the numbers there LFC, the club is valued at £1.19bn, so i think the glaziers would be looking at £2bn taking into account the debt, they will probably want to make some more profit as well the way the Quatar Royals will be spending on the world cup is gonna be huge and this would be another step into the footballing world, and most importantly how to run a huge stadium and promote the sport an extra £250m will be nothing considering once they buy the club they wont have to put their hand in their pockets for players or wages like city or chelsea. they could easily take an extra £25m more than the glaziers each season for the next 20 years to double that investment(this would be profit LFC) im not saying its happening, but with those figures floating about that's a fairly realistic situation the club could see itself in. it would pretty much end any competition in the premiership |
| "I don't play against a particular team. I play against the idea of losing." - Cantona | |
|
|
| TheReturnOfTheKing | Jan 7 2011, 12:59 AM Post #77 |
|
Definitely NOT a Terrorist
|
who values it at 1.9bn? serious question btw, cant see it worth more than 1bn its a business with huge debts and making losses each year look at us, everyone was like we were valued at 500m but in the end nobody was paying more than 300 for us Edited by TheReturnOfTheKing, Jan 7 2011, 01:00 AM.
|
| no | |
|
|
| Monty | Jan 7 2011, 01:02 AM Post #78 |
![]()
I'm a naughty boy
|
http://www.andersred.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
| TheReturnOfTheKing | Jan 7 2011, 01:04 AM Post #79 |
|
Definitely NOT a Terrorist
|
fair to think it after reading that keano, still find it hard to believe anyone can keep somethng this big under wraps |
| no | |
|
|
| Jeffers | Jan 7 2011, 01:05 AM Post #80 |
|
Ginger Prince
|
can you not read? £1.19bn the price on forbes, I stated £2bn which includes wiping the debt. once the debt is wiped it then gains around £70m extra a year. all of your questions were answered in the post you questioned yer liverpool were in the s**t though, unsustainable wage bill, ageing side, out of the CL, no youth realistically coming through(yes pachedo etc.. all have potential but they are/were not being used) Edited by Jeffers, Jan 7 2011, 01:06 AM.
|
| "I don't play against a particular team. I play against the idea of losing." - Cantona | |
|
|
| Plonker | Jan 7 2011, 01:05 AM Post #81 |
![]()
Oracle of Truth.
|
|
![]() | |
|
|
| TheReturnOfTheKing | Jan 7 2011, 01:07 AM Post #82 |
|
Definitely NOT a Terrorist
|
that 1.2bn includes the debt mate 750m debt and the rest profit for them |
| no | |
|
|
| TheReturnOfTheKing | Jan 7 2011, 01:08 AM Post #83 |
|
Definitely NOT a Terrorist
|
huge debt does not increase value btw... |
| no | |
|
|
| Jeffers | Jan 7 2011, 01:10 AM Post #84 |
|
Ginger Prince
|
surely wiping the debt would increase the value of the club, especially if you include the extra revenue from not having to pay it off
|
| "I don't play against a particular team. I play against the idea of losing." - Cantona | |
|
|
| Monty | Jan 7 2011, 01:11 AM Post #85 |
![]()
I'm a naughty boy
|
The club is valued between 1 and 1.8bn. |
|
|
| Plonker | Jan 7 2011, 01:12 AM Post #86 |
![]()
Oracle of Truth.
|
Japanese Yen? |
![]() | |
|
|
| Jeffers | Jan 7 2011, 01:12 AM Post #87 |
|
Ginger Prince
|
the club would be bought for £1.19bn(the price it is worth with debt) then the debt written off, the value of the club would then increase without debt and repayments unless you are saying paying off the debt would make the club less valuable |
| "I don't play against a particular team. I play against the idea of losing." - Cantona | |
|
|
| Jeffers | Jan 7 2011, 01:24 AM Post #88 |
|
Ginger Prince
|
its hilarious that you cannot read
|
| "I don't play against a particular team. I play against the idea of losing." - Cantona | |
|
|
| TheReturnOfTheKing | Jan 7 2011, 03:28 PM Post #89 |
|
Definitely NOT a Terrorist
|
you are confused, you did not make sense, just because the debt goes off does not mean that value is then put on top of the current value forbes dont consider debt when valuing the company at all, nor the profits, so it would not go up on their books so to speak Edited by TheReturnOfTheKing, Jan 7 2011, 03:29 PM.
|
| no | |
|
|
| Monty | Jan 9 2011, 01:42 AM Post #90 |
![]()
I'm a naughty boy
|
Apparently the Qatar group are desperate to takeover the club. |
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Barclays Premier League · Next Topic » |






8:08 PM Jul 11