| Greetings and welcome to The Football Net. We love talking balls, do you? You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. Therefore you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, take part in the banter, vote in polls and enjoy fun competitions such as fantasy football and the betting exchange. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join us today on our football forums to talk balls with us! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| The Olympic Stadium | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 21 2011, 12:27 AM (227 Views) | |
| Dotty | Jan 21 2011, 12:27 AM Post #1 |
![]()
Stuck up bastard
|
Should a club in WHU's financial state be allowed a loan like this? |
|
|
| footyfan000 | Jan 21 2011, 12:50 AM Post #2 |
|
Changing my tune since 2008.
|
In answer to your question, no. But with Labour being in power of that council, it is a small wonder that such massive risks are being taken with our money
|
|
|
| Monty | Jan 21 2011, 01:22 AM Post #3 |
![]()
I'm a naughty boy
|
Will they fill it when they're int he Championship? |
|
|
| RetardedDwarf | Jan 21 2011, 08:31 PM Post #4 |
![]()
Hamster Molester
|
I think it should go to Hammers just because of where its based (as long as they can prove they can afford it). Spurs are a North London team, Hammers are an East End team and Stratford is Hammers terrority. The are quite a few clubs closer to the Olympic Stadium than Spurs. Suprised the hasnt been mores complaints from the Spurs supporters. Saying that, if I was to be totally honest, I think no team should get it unless they are willing to pay close to what it cost to build. From what i hear, whoever gets it, is getting it at around a 10th of the build cost and IMO thats unfair to every other team on the basis that its been funded by the taxpayer. |
| |
|
|
| TheReturnOfTheKing | Jan 21 2011, 08:36 PM Post #5 |
|
Definitely NOT a Terrorist
|
they should have to pay like 20m per season to lease it imo very unfair on other clubs |
| no | |
|
|
| mcfc1975 | Mar 30 2011, 04:30 PM Post #6 |
|
Phorum Pimp
|
|
![]() ![]() #prayforuwe | |
|
|
| Skywarp | Mar 30 2011, 04:31 PM Post #7 |
|
Tadpole's Excrement
|
They wouldn't even fill it in the Premiership much less the Championship. |
|
|
| mcfc1975 | Oct 11 2011, 01:30 PM Post #8 |
|
Phorum Pimp
|
west ham rejected spurs have come across as a bunch of whiney bitches tbh i hope that no one wants it now and they are stuck with an athletics stadium that is used once every 2 years |
![]() ![]() #prayforuwe | |
|
|
| UwesGrandad | Oct 11 2011, 08:03 PM Post #9 |
![]()
El Mago
|
Not sure what the overall Westham fanbase is but 25-30 thousand fans in a 60 thousand seater stadium! It'll be terrible to watch and attend games there. Pointless ![]() Also think spurs have made themselves look like a bunch of sad beggers. Their fans dont even want the move ffs |
Will be keeping Cech in my pocket for the next 3 months. Thanks Pedro
| |
|
|
| tebroc | Oct 11 2011, 11:25 PM Post #10 |
![]()
Beetlejuice's Body Double
|
should have been located in the midlands anyway
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Barclays Premier League · Next Topic » |












5:33 PM Jul 13