-
Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Greetings and welcome to The Football Net. We love talking balls, do you?


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. Therefore you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, take part in the banter, vote in polls and enjoy fun competitions such as fantasy football and the betting exchange. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join us today on our football forums to talk balls with us!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
League to Replace Friendlies
Topic Started: Oct 10 2013, 09:22 PM (762 Views)
Dotty
Member Avatar
Stuck up bastard
Uefa is considering a radical overhaul of international football that would see national teams playing a new Nations League competition.

The idea, floated at executive committee meetings that preceded aUefa meeting in Dubrovnik last month, would see Uefa using existing dates for friendlies in the international calendar to launch a new league involving all 54 member nations.

Uefa sources have told the Guardian that the idea was one of several floated at the meeting as part of a discussion about how to improve the attractiveness of international football from 2018 onwards. The Uefa executive committee will now examine the idea in more detail before deciding whether to adopt it.

The new concept, first revealed by Norwegian paper Dagbladet, would see all Uefa's members divided into a series of perhaps nine divisions based on their recent results, with promotion and relegation following each round of matches.

The winner of the first division would be Uefa's Nations League champion and win a substantial prize, with the bottom team in each division being relegated in favour of the winner of the tier below.

The Norwegian FA president, Yngve Hallen, who sits on UEFA's national committee for international tournaments, said: "It is true that a series of games is one of the models being discussed."

The discussions are taking place against a backdrop of concern that the qualifying campaigns for the expanded European Championships from 2016 will prove less attractive because there will be less jeopardy.

In conjunction with other Uefa innovations due to be introduced from 2014 onwards, including its "week of football" in which qualifiers will take place across six days to maximise viewers, the drive from its HQ in Nyon is to boost the profile of the international game.

Uefa has recently taken central control of TV rights for the competitive qualifying matches of all its member nations, promising large underwritten guarantees to the biggest countries. That has increased the pressure on Uefa to bring in funding from TV and commercial partners in order to meet them.

If the Uefa Nations League idea is explored further, then the European governing body would be likely to look to centralise the TV and marketing rights in the same way as it has for the Champions League.

"The success of the Champions League has already inspired the Europa League. This is also something they are trying to look at in connection with the Nations League - how this can sharpen the market. That's what this is largely about," said Hallen.

"But there have been very clear political guidelines from all 54 federations that the focus needs to be on the football/competitive aspect. All countries should have equal opportunities," he added.

"No-one should have to qualify for this tournament - everyone plays from the first game. And then there is also a recognition that tournament form should be easy to understand for most people. All this we need to work out."

The Swedish FA representative Karl-Erik Nilsson told Aftonbladet that "it has been established that it is difficult to get interest around friendlies".

"For 2020 it has been looked at whether it would be possible to combine traditional qualifiers with with this league format, instead of friendlies, to increase interest," he said.

"It is worth looking at but we were clear that it can't have an impact on the qualifiers for the Euro tournaments. The qualifiers are No1 and have the highest priority. There won't be more international games because of this."

He said the initial reaction among the 54 members was that "creating more interest is not something negative".

Nilsson added: "All 54 members were in Croatia and the idea was presented from a perspective of: is this worth looking at? And the overall feeling was: 'let's look at it but don't let it have an impact on the qualifiers'."

He said that one idea included in the presentation was to divide the groups so that clubs next to one another in the Fifa rankings were grouped together, while another version envisaged a geographical structure.

The FA and the other big European associations may be among the most difficult to convince of the merits of the plan, because they would have to give up the possibility of lucrative friendlies against big South American sides.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Interesting idea, but ultimately pointless.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jeffers
Member Avatar
Ginger Prince
I think the element of competitiveness would help teams and fans(because we all moan when there is friendlies breaking up the club football)
"I don't play against a particular team. I play against the idea of losing." - Cantona
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Papa_Lazarou
Member Avatar
Randolph
Any International football outside of the main tournaments is a bit s**t but I would certainly prefer to have this sort of setup rather than the pointless friendlies we have now. At least this way there is a reason to play the fixture. Just so long as they have no intention to add any additional fixtures I can't see a problem with the idea at all.
Posted Image

Oppa Papa Style
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
FLOPP'D
Member Avatar
The King in the North
Silly idea imo. Friendlies are supposed to be about experimentation and trying out new players. Look at someone like Gerrard who basically plays 90 minutes every game as it is, a league will just put more pressure on managers to play their best players.
Posted Image



John Henry April 2011
 
Success is winning championships. It is nothing less than that. And when you win a championship – and we will – success isn't measured or accomplished by winning once
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Papa_Lazarou
Member Avatar
Randolph
No reason it should stop experimentation. Look at it like the International equivalent of the league cup.

The only issue I can see is that it would completely do away with any fixtures against nations outside UEFA. If they are replacing all of the friendly fixtures with this league then you have no chance to play any games against teams from South America outside of the World Cup for example.
Posted Image

Oppa Papa Style
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jeffers
Member Avatar
Ginger Prince
Maybe you have an age limit on the league games (23 like the football at the Olympics) and still have the friendlies/qualifiers where the players older play. Obviously stand out younger players like Wilshire and Rooney at that age should be bought forward to the first team squad for qualifiers.

It will give a lot of the younger player proper time to show what they can do, rather than the last 10 mins of a friendly.

Any player that would refuse to play for the league games should be dropped from the main squad
"I don't play against a particular team. I play against the idea of losing." - Cantona
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jeffers
Member Avatar
Ginger Prince
butland
Jenkinson Jones Caulker Shaw
Zaha Rodwell Barkley Sterling
Oxalade-Chamberlin
Welbeck

There would be a lot more excitement about watching a team like that, that the usual England regulars
"I don't play against a particular team. I play against the idea of losing." - Cantona
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dotty
Member Avatar
Stuck up bastard
You've just described the way things are set up now with U21 football.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jeffers
Member Avatar
Ginger Prince
Yer but there are players that get called up but play very little game time, there is no point in playing u-21 friendlies IMO So if there was a competitive game they could be playing, rather than just warming the bench for the first team it would surely be more beneficial
"I don't play against a particular team. I play against the idea of losing." - Cantona
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dotty
Member Avatar
Stuck up bastard
Then make an U21 league.

If the criteria was 4 players must be under a certain age than fair enough, something like this could be beneficial. But what this idea is and what you've described is just fancifying something that already exists and serves no purpose.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dotty
Member Avatar
Stuck up bastard
A "League of Nations" that would be a third major tournament for European countries after the World Cup and European Championship is expected to be given the go-ahead by Uefa on Thursday

Games would be played in odd-numbered years on dates reserved for friendlies, starting after the 2018 World Cup.

No exact details have been confirmed, but there would be up to four divisions with promotion and relegation, plus a 'final four' competition in the summer.

England would likely be in a top tier.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/26747394
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · International Football · Next Topic »
Add Reply

-- -